Quality and Safety in Health Care for Diagnostic- myassignmenthelp

Question: Examine about theQuality and Safety in Health Care for Patient Diagnostic. Answer: Presentation This is essentially characterized as a mistake that happens when medicinal services supplier misunderstands the analysis. There are occurrences when this mistake isn't too high while other example intense (Singh et al., 2013). The indicative blunder can cause significant misfortunes like demise and some of the time bring about all out incapacity. There is a need of joint effort between network psychological well-being specialist organizations and inpatient clinic administrations suppliers in offering the best support of the patients. On occasion they should include patients themselves in their everyday treatment to accomplish the ideal outcome (Walsh, J., Boyle, 2009). This paper will concentrate on the kinds of analytic blunders, factors causing symptomatic mistakes, measures to decrease these mistakes by utilizing the writing accessible and the level of individuals influenced. Fretful administrations are administrations given to the patient by the medical clinic coordinated by the social insurance proficient with a reason to mind and offer treatment of scatters and different infections (Absulem Hardin, 2010). They incorporate bed and board/emergency clinic offices, clinical social administrations, helpful and guiding administrations, clinical/careful administrations and administrations offered by private-obligation medical caretaker or specialist (Chare et al., 2014). Network psychological wellness administrations is characterized as administrations gave by the administration associations and emotional wellness experts offering support to a specific chose topographical zone. Network emotional wellness administrations can likewise be an arrangement of private or good cause associations. Network psychological well-being administrations isn't constrained to it and can likewise offer day places, neighborhood essential consideration clinical administrations, up held lodging, network emotional well-being focuses, and self improvement gatherings for psychological well-being (Sue et al., 1991). There are preferences that collect from applying network based administrations for the emotional wellness and the remember helping for appraisal of requirements for specific administrations and help with figuring out where the offices can endure utilization of populace pointers (Jorm, 2012). The other advantage may incorporate assisting with alter the course that constrained the patients to be ousted from their homes and neighborhoods once in the past happened where establishment were intended for huge catchment. And furthermore it furnishes with a stage at which general grown-ups psychological wellness can be resolved. Sorts of symptomatic mistakes in medication An inappropriate determination otherwise called misdiagnosis happens when a specialist recognizes an inappropriate disease in a patient. For example, a specialist could determine a patient to have HIV/AIDs when the patient is HIV/AIDs free (Singh, et al., 2013). Missed conclusion is another symptomatic mistake and is where a specialist gives a physician's approval while the patient is, truth be told, sick. The other blunder is Delayed misdiagnosis which is exceptionally normal in demonstrative mistakes and happens where the specialist recognizes the correct sickness yet after quite a while (Bradford et al., 2009). Inability to analyze an irrelevant sickness is the other case and is the place a specialist will distinguish a malady and neglect to analyze random ailment. Inability to analyze a related malady is likewise experienced and this is the place the specialist distinguishes the correct sickness or ailment yet neglects to analyze the furthermore related infection which could be the reason for the other ailment or result from it. The extent of indicative blunder It is the objective of clinical professionals in both network and emergency clinics to give the best medicines to the patients at whatever point they are unwell through protected and excellent consideration, yet on occasion individuals, tragically, get hurt. A ton has been done and keeps on being done to comprehend this worldwide test (dangerous human services) makes suggestions and how fix it. As indicated by an investigation that was done in a high-pay nation, it was discovered that a 5% of grown-ups who are in outpatient settings experience symptomatic mistakes, half of which had intense damage. It is indicated that regular symptomatic mistakes were found in patients with intense renal disappointment 5%, pneumonia 7%, Cancer 5%, decompensate congestive cardiovascular breakdown 5% and urinary tract contamination at 5%. Youngsters are at the most serious dangers of misdiagnosis since the main barely any measures of exploration in presence is about constrained to grown-ups patients. There are more than 12 million Americans who endure and experience misdiagnosis and it is evaluated that nearly everybody will encounter misdiagnosis in the course of their life, some of which would bring about high results. This is as per a 2014 based investigation. It was discovered that one out of 20 outpatients had either been given an inappropriate data on the reason for their ailment, rewarded for illnesses they didn't have or experienced deferred treatment. Not at all like solid grown-ups who can tell when they are debilitated, youngsters have greater difficulties telling when they are wiped out or what they are feeling. There is additionally an issue of mistaken remedy which results from poor penmanship, disarray of medications with comparative names, unseemly truncations, abuse of decimal focuses, zeros and so forth. In the U.S alone, a 1999 report distributed by the Institute of Medicine named To Err Is Human stunned networks of clinical experts by detailing that 98,000 individuals kick the bucket because of mix-ups in emergency clinics. Various clinical experts restricted the report yet now they are tolerating it bit by bit (Sue et al., 1991). The main kind of paid clinical acts of neglect claims is indicative blunders and it is about twofold in the passings of people in contrast with different cases. On occasion hurt doesn't happen because of analytic mistakes particularly when the patients manifestations resolve even with an inappropriate determination. Be that as it may, mistakes can cause hurt on account of deferred fitting treatment, treatment of wrong ailment, forestall suitable treatment, and on numerous events bringing about the mental and budgetary weight. Indicative mistakes There is no single equation material and that can lessen the symptomatic mistakes and accomplished the ideal changes. Different strides to improve the wreckage must be looked for and require critical duty as indicated by an advisory groups end. Components causing demonstrative mistakes Patients inability to give precise clinical history, or family neglecting to obviously furnish a background marked by a patient with subjective brokenness. Absence of information to look for earnest consideration from wellbeing suppliers. Mistaken doctor assessment of the issue. Human services suppliers absence of information on the significant condition, among others. Absence of sufficient correspondence and cooperation between clinicians, patients just as their families. Poor structure of human services framework that underpins analytic procedure. A few societies that demoralize straightforwardness and divulgence of demonstrative blunders which causes this symptomatic mistakes to proceed Limiting the patient wellbeing issue The board of trustees arrived at a few decisions one being a prerequisite for earnest changes to address the issue of symptomatic blunder, which is a significant test in quality medicinal services. Unsuitable quantities of patients of both normal and uncommon sicknesses keep on experiencing the industriousness of demonstrative blunders in all parts, and there is little consideration paid on exploration or human services practice, to the event of indicative mistakes. On the off chance that this continues each individual should encounter a symptomatic mistake at any rate once in the course of their life (McFadden, Henagan, Gowen, 2009). An ongoing report gauges that grown-ups who look for outpatient benefits in the U.S, 5% of them have been wrongly analyzed. 10% of patients passings as per the analysts Postmortem assessment show that they are contributed by demonstrative blunder (Ely, Graber, Croskerry, 2011). Second, Healthcare calling ought to include patients and furthermore their f amilies to in teaching them on the likely explanations of demonstrative blunder and the potential methods of improving indicative procedure. This is on the grounds that understanding and their families have the correct data on the analytic history (Naidu, 2009). Third, Intra and between proficient cooperation where analytic procedure relying upon the patient medical issue, different sorts of medicinal services proficient can be included, for example, essential consideration clinicians, attendants, technocrats, advisors, social specialists and so forth. (Vyas et al., 2012).The board of trustees saw that the significant supporters of clinical mistakes are deficient collaboration and correspondence .Fourth, the utilization of wellbeing data innovation (wellbeing IT) will enable solid analytic testing to result. Giving patients a chance of learning the procedure of finding just as making an opportunity for patients family incorporation in endeavors to improve the procedure by learning of surprising result was likewise to a great extent proposed. Quiet centere viewpoint. It is vital to consider indicative procedure as a patient focused point of view since the patient is bears the danger of analytic related damage (Shumba, Atukunda, Memiah, 2013). Along these lines perceiving patients as the significant accomplices in the analytic procedure and social insurance framework ought to be unavoidable and should be energized and bolster their commitment in help of deferential gaining from the procedure. Rules and quality markers for best acts of determination Social insurance experts ought to include patients and furthermore their families to in instructing them on the likely explanations of indicative mistake and the potential methods of improving analytic procedure (Carman et al., 2013). This is significant on the grounds that the patient to be explicit necessities to have the information about the likelihood of a mistake happening during finding forms just as their families since they are additionally significant later on particularly if the patient would turn out to be mentally influenced. By instructing the family and the patient proper treatment can be wear

The Negative Effects of Violence on TV Essay Free Essays

The aggregate of power on broadcasting presents is inacceptable. The stuff that you see on shows that are â€Å"supposedly for kids† only don’t appear it. As increasingly more savage broadcasting shows and plans are disclosed each individual dull. We will compose a custom paper test on The Negative Effects of Violence on TV Essay or on the other hand any comparative subject just for you Request Now childs are influenced by it in a negative way. Surveies have demonstrated that revelations of power to childs at early ages will affect them intellectually. They will either get down to accept nil of power. or on the other hand be over-scared due to what he/she may hold seen on Television. The Television stations ought to non be permitted to uncover this kind of stuff and power to childs at such early ages. in light of the delayed consequences it will hang on the teenagers and children. Above all else. there is way too much power on broadcasting whether it is on some head cut channel. or then again even a Saturday forenoon sketch plan. For some head cut Television appears. there are three to five hours rough Acts of the Apostless per hr. For each Saturday plan for childs. there are around twenty to 25 vicious Acts of the Apostless per hr. ( Frazier ) This shows how much power there is on â€Å"children shows† . In an example for the National Television Violence Study. it was discovered that around 60 for every centum of ten-thousand broadcasting plans contained savage stuff. ( Kunkel ) That is a cluster! That study â€Å"identified a standard of 6. 000 fierce collaborations in an individual hebdomad of programming over the 23 channels that were inspected. counting both communicate and abroad wire networks. The greater part of the savage shows ( 53 % ) contained fatal Acts of the Apostless. what's more, one out of four of the plans with power ( 25 % ) delineated the utilization of a weapon. ( Kunkel ) That implies that the main part of broadcasting appears. regardless of whether for kids or non. will hold power on that arrangement the greater part the time. ) Statisticss other than demonstrated that the mean arrangement for kids all the more as often as possible contained more power so the mean Adult Television. Indeed, even in some â€Å"G† appraised films. there is power. That is exorbitantly unfortunate especially as a result of the impacts it causes. Presently. on the off chance that you put that detail alongside how much children sit in front of the Television every day. â€Å"An mean American child tickers broadcasting 21-23 hours for every hebdomad. ( Frazier ) That implies per hebdomad. 60 for each centum of those 20s or so hours will hold something fierce that will hold a negative result on the children. Other than. fitting to the American Psychiatric Association in 1996. youngsters will hold saw 10. 000 phony slayings and 200. 000 Acts of the Apostless of power by the age of 18. ( Frazier ) Besides rehashed introduction to constrain from broadcasting is undesirable for the child’s character. With childs being around power while viewing â€Å"kid’s shows† . â€Å"the youngster turns out to be less delicate towards its impacts on casualties and the human suffering it causes. ( Boyse ) Research has demonstrated in the past mature ages that the power on broadcasts so has a negative result on kids. Research from the National Institute of Mental Health in 1982. power is said to take to forceful conduct by children and teenagers. Indeed, even before this. one of the most notable surveies done in 1963 by Bandura demonstrated that power has a significant result on the individuals that see it. â€Å"He had a gathering of children see a Television image of a hypothetical record who kicked and rebuffed a hyperbolic plastic doll. After the screening. the children were put in an uproar live with different children who had non seen the image. Those that saw the image showed essentially more forceful conduct than the individuals who didn’t. † Other surveies indicated that childs who saw fierce sketchs had a high chance to non parcel their toys with others. Another review made in 1972 with Liebert and Baron. affirmed the discoveries of Bandura. â€Å"This review examined children’s ability to hurt different children in the wake of sing forceful Television plans. Two gatherings of children viewed an alternate Television plan. one of which had forceful substance and one of which was generic. The individuals who saw the forceful arrangement ( The Untouchables ) were seen as all the more ready to throb another child in the wake of sing the arrangement than the individuals who viewed the generic arrangement ( a way race ) . † ( Frazier ) These unsafe impacts from the power depicted on broadcasting are gathered into three essential classs ; â€Å"children’s obtaining of forceful perspectives and practices ; desensitization. or then again an expanded mercilessness towards casualties of power ; and expanded or exaggerated dread of being misled forcibly. While these impacts reflect ominous outcomes. it is the first †an expanded inclining for vicious conduct †that is at the core of open wellbeing worry about broadcast power. † ( Kunkel ) Back to desensitization. â€Å"According to the article â€Å"Media Violence. † the American media shows legends reasonably using power as an office to choose battle. The American Academy of Pediatrics site proposes that attracted out presentation to this sort of power increases confidence of power as an organization of maintain excursion sources of income. The 1995 to 1997 AAP National Television Study indicated that 61 for every centum of programming â€Å"portrayed relational power. a lot of it in an engaging or glamorized mode. † Children are attracted to such booking when the brutal demonstration appears to be phantasmagoric and the insufficiency of impact appealing. † ( Adams ) He other than expressed that power is both disinfected. â€Å"By sterilized. prompt harming and desolation by survivors of power is remembered for not exactly 50% of all scenes of power. In excess of a third of vicious cooperations portray ridiculously gentle injury to casualties. horribly limiting the disagreeableness of hurt that would occur from such activities in the existent universe. In sum. most word pictures sterilize power by doing it seem to be substantially less agonizing and less unsafe than it genuinely is. By glamorized. I imply that power is performed by appealing capacity hypothetical records who are as often as possible legitimized for moving strongly and who endure no remorse. negative judgment. or on the other hand discipline for their brutal conduct. In excess of a third of all power is submitted by alluring characters. what's more, more than 66% of the power they submit happens with no characteristics of punishment. † ( Kunkel ) One other employment children may defy is overexposure to compel. â€Å"Overexposure to drive. furthermore, unconventionally sensibly portrayed power. may take children to accept that the universe is primarily a perilous and uncertain topographic point. They may get down to exaggerate the likelihood that they will be casualties of power. go forthing them with undue uneasiness and accentuation. ( Frazier ) Other than doing passionate occupations. it can do some mischief to a child’s turning character or moral thought processes. â€Å"Sigmund Freud accepted that children need to build up a feeling of ethical quality by the age of five or they could see inconveniences sometime down the road. On the off chance that a child doesn’t figure out how to comprehend the distinction among right and wrong. she will non build up a legitimate fear of blame or remorse. what's more, will consequently be bound to arraign imprudently in practices that are considered socially and ethically off base. The article â€Å"Children. Teenagers. furthermore, Television† states that exploration has demonstrated broadcasting power to hold a negative result on the scholastic open introduction. sex. natural structure develops. also, mental self views of juvenile review crowds. which can take to brutal or forceful conduct and substance abuse. † ( Adams ) Nowadays. with these â€Å"reality shows† on MTV. The E Network. and so on it’s simple and typical to see power. Childs that watch â€Å"The Kardashians† and â€Å"Teen Mom† see their preferred celebrated people act in a way that is amateurish on broadcasting. be that as it may, they don’t know better. They need to be just similar to them. TV programs like those truly use power and â€Å"incidents† to help raise their assessment and notoriety. ( Caning ) With these psychological impacts caused from unnecessarily much screening of power. this demonstrates how broadcasting planning should be progressively delicate for the substance made for kids. In add-on. guardians ought to other than look for and loan in filtrating what their children watch on broadcasting. There are diverse stairss you can take. that would perchance be able to let your child to non be presented to such power on Television appears. You can look for and watch broadcasting with your childs. That way. you’ll recognize what they watch. also, you can order the substance. ( Boyse ) Other choices incorporate seeing the substance of the arrangement or potentially only allocating them a shorter aggregate of clasp to stare at the Television. At any rate that way. there is a littler open door for power in the littler clasp space. ( Frazier ) One other great way to keep up your child’s mind off of broadcasting is look for and secure them included like different exercises. Sports. perusing. occupations. and so on ; anything like that. Another great idea is look for and address your childs about power in media. On the off chance that you can elucidate to them why power is erroneous. so you can be increasingly eased and swear them. ( Boyse ) Good conveying is cardinal. On the off chance that you attempt to change over to your child that you are simply looking to be concerned and mindful. they’ll comprehend the point you are looking to do. In choice. I accept that children merit better than what is by and by going on. As their capacity hypothetical records. we have to help do their â€Å"future† safe. We have to forbid all power from children’s planning. TV slots shouldn’t be permitted to uncover improper stuff and power to

Eating Disorders in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People

Eating Disorders in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People Eating Disorders Awareness and Prevention Print Eating Disorders in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People By Lauren Muhlheim, PsyD, CEDS facebook twitter linkedin Lauren Muhlheim, PsyD, is a certified eating disorders expert and clinical psychologist who provides cognitive behavioral psychotherapy. Learn about our editorial policy Lauren Muhlheim, PsyD, CEDS Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Rachel Goldman, PhD, FTOS on February 06, 2020 Rachel Goldman, PhD FTOS is a licensed psychologist, clinical assistant professor, speaker, wellness expert specializing in weight management and eating behaviors.   Learn about our Medical Review Board Rachel Goldman, PhD, FTOS on February 06, 2020 Mixmike/E+ / Getty Images More in Eating Disorders Awareness and Prevention Symptoms Treatment Diagnosis Eating disorders affect people of all ages, genders, ethnicities, and sexual orientations. However, they may disproportionately affect members of certain groups, such as members of a sexual minority. These groups comprise anyone who does not identify as entirely heterosexual, including people who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual; those who report attractions to people of the same or multiple genders; and individuals who report engaging in sexual contact with people of the same or multiple genders. Unfortunately, most of the eating disorder research to date has focused on heterosexual cisgender white women. Less is known about eating disorders among people with diverse sexual orientations. Furthermore, this community faces unique and additional stressorsâ€"such as stigma and discriminationâ€"that may affect health. Another confounding factor is that many studies and articles lump together gender-diverse and sexually-diverse people under the umbrella LGBTQâ€"lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer. However, gender identity and sexual orientation describe different phenomena. Research findings from studies of sexually diverse groups are not necessarily applicable to gender identity diverse groups and vice versa. Transgender people can have any sexual orientation, including heterosexual. This article will focus on diverse sexual orientation only. For gender diversity in eating disorders, please see Eating Disorders inTransgender People. Even accepting this restriction, gay, lesbian, and bisexual people represent a very diverse group. Research often fails to capture intersecting identities that can increase oppression and stigmaâ€"people who are members of multiple marginalized groups may have different experiences as a result of this. Thus, generalizing findings from a group of people who identify as gay or lesbian or bisexual to all people who identify as gay or lesbian or bisexual is not always valid. Prevalence of Eating Disorders in LGB People Only a few studies have investigated sexual orientation and eating disorders in adolescents. Some school-based studies have shown that gay boys and boys with same-sex partners had more disordered eating behaviors and more body dissatisfaction than their heterosexual peers. One study found that gay and bisexual secondary school boys and girls were more likely to report purging and diet pill use than their heterosexual peers. Among Men Research has consistently demonstrated that gay and bisexual men are disproportionately affected by eating disorders. While only about 3% of the US male population is gay or bisexual, estimates of the percentage of males with eating disorders who are gay or bisexual range from 14 to 42%. A common myth and sometimes stigmatizing factor for men witheating disorders is that they are often presumed to be gay. It’s important to note that the majority of males with eating disorders are still heterosexual. The same holds for sub-clinical eating disorders. Compared to heterosexual men, gay and bisexual men also exhibit more symptoms of disordered eating. One study found that the number of gay and bisexual men with symptoms of disordered eating was ten times higher than among heterosexual men. What You Need to Know About Male Eating Disorders Among Women Among lesbian and bisexual women, findings regarding eating disorders are more mixed. Some studies report increased levels of disordered eating among lesbian and bisexual women, but others show no significant difference from the rates in heterosexual women. One explanation for these conflicting findings may be the lack of efforts to distinguish between the different groups of homosexual women or between queer women of different ethnic groups. A commonly held belief is that lesbian and bisexual girls and women are at reduced risk for eating disorders compared to heterosexual females. Unfortunately, this can lead to a lower likelihood of lesbian and bisexual females with eating disorders getting diagnosed and accessing treatment. Theories About Mechanisms of Eating Disorders in LGB People Some of the disparities among prevalence rates between LGB people and their heterosexual peers may be explained by the minority stress model. People of marginalized groups frequently face victimization, discrimination, and adversity arising from their stigmatized identities. They also may receive less social support from family. These stressors can lead to increased risk for a number of health and mental health problems. In terms of eating disorders, people who identify as LGB may attempt to manage stress and distress through behaviors such as dieting or bingeing, which are in turn common symptoms of eating disorders. Further theories posit that gay culture and the gay community place a heightened focus on physical appearance, putting pressures and demands on gay men that are similar to those felt by heterosexual women. Applying this same lens to lesbian and bisexual women, it has been proposed they may be less prone to eating disorders because they do not share the standards of feminine beauty and pressures placed on heterosexual women by Western culture. While provocative, these theories about the role of physical appearance have not been tested and there is a profound risk in reducing eating disorders in a large group of diverse people to a single mechanism. There is much more to eating disorders than body image. Eating disorders are caused by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Body Image and Eating Disorders Treatment of LGB People With Eating Disorders There are no treatments specifically for LGB people with eating disorders. Treatments developed for heterosexual patients may be effective when applied with cultural sensitivity. It is important for providers to attend to issues about sexual identity. Therapists can help patients to address internalized homophobia and coming out and to work on self-acceptance and increasing self-esteem. Because LGB people may lack social support, increasing it can also be an important focus of treatment. Unfortunately, LGB people can face increased barriers to treatment. Almost all of the materials about eating disorders are written for cisgender heterosexual women so diverse people may not feel welcome at eating disorder treatment facilities. LGB people may face a lack of culturally competent providers who have both eating disorder expertise and sensitivity to the complexity of their sexual identity. Or they may feel uncomfortable talking about their experiences in treatment environments where the majority of people are heterosexual. They may need extra support and connection with other LGB people. When that cannot be found within their treatment environment, they may find it in support communities online. The 9 Best Online Therapy Programs

Eating Disorders in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People

Eating Disorders in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People Eating Disorders Awareness and Prevention Print Eating Disorders in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People By Lauren Muhlheim, PsyD, CEDS facebook twitter linkedin Lauren Muhlheim, PsyD, is a certified eating disorders expert and clinical psychologist who provides cognitive behavioral psychotherapy. Learn about our editorial policy Lauren Muhlheim, PsyD, CEDS Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Rachel Goldman, PhD, FTOS on February 06, 2020 Rachel Goldman, PhD FTOS is a licensed psychologist, clinical assistant professor, speaker, wellness expert specializing in weight management and eating behaviors.   Learn about our Medical Review Board Rachel Goldman, PhD, FTOS on February 06, 2020 Mixmike/E+ / Getty Images More in Eating Disorders Awareness and Prevention Symptoms Treatment Diagnosis Eating disorders affect people of all ages, genders, ethnicities, and sexual orientations. However, they may disproportionately affect members of certain groups, such as members of a sexual minority. These groups comprise anyone who does not identify as entirely heterosexual, including people who identify as gay, lesbian, or bisexual; those who report attractions to people of the same or multiple genders; and individuals who report engaging in sexual contact with people of the same or multiple genders. Unfortunately, most of the eating disorder research to date has focused on heterosexual cisgender white women. Less is known about eating disorders among people with diverse sexual orientations. Furthermore, this community faces unique and additional stressorsâ€"such as stigma and discriminationâ€"that may affect health. Another confounding factor is that many studies and articles lump together gender-diverse and sexually-diverse people under the umbrella LGBTQâ€"lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer. However, gender identity and sexual orientation describe different phenomena. Research findings from studies of sexually diverse groups are not necessarily applicable to gender identity diverse groups and vice versa. Transgender people can have any sexual orientation, including heterosexual. This article will focus on diverse sexual orientation only. For gender diversity in eating disorders, please see Eating Disorders inTransgender People. Even accepting this restriction, gay, lesbian, and bisexual people represent a very diverse group. Research often fails to capture intersecting identities that can increase oppression and stigmaâ€"people who are members of multiple marginalized groups may have different experiences as a result of this. Thus, generalizing findings from a group of people who identify as gay or lesbian or bisexual to all people who identify as gay or lesbian or bisexual is not always valid. Prevalence of Eating Disorders in LGB People Only a few studies have investigated sexual orientation and eating disorders in adolescents. Some school-based studies have shown that gay boys and boys with same-sex partners had more disordered eating behaviors and more body dissatisfaction than their heterosexual peers. One study found that gay and bisexual secondary school boys and girls were more likely to report purging and diet pill use than their heterosexual peers. Among Men Research has consistently demonstrated that gay and bisexual men are disproportionately affected by eating disorders. While only about 3% of the US male population is gay or bisexual, estimates of the percentage of males with eating disorders who are gay or bisexual range from 14 to 42%. A common myth and sometimes stigmatizing factor for men witheating disorders is that they are often presumed to be gay. It’s important to note that the majority of males with eating disorders are still heterosexual. The same holds for sub-clinical eating disorders. Compared to heterosexual men, gay and bisexual men also exhibit more symptoms of disordered eating. One study found that the number of gay and bisexual men with symptoms of disordered eating was ten times higher than among heterosexual men. What You Need to Know About Male Eating Disorders Among Women Among lesbian and bisexual women, findings regarding eating disorders are more mixed. Some studies report increased levels of disordered eating among lesbian and bisexual women, but others show no significant difference from the rates in heterosexual women. One explanation for these conflicting findings may be the lack of efforts to distinguish between the different groups of homosexual women or between queer women of different ethnic groups. A commonly held belief is that lesbian and bisexual girls and women are at reduced risk for eating disorders compared to heterosexual females. Unfortunately, this can lead to a lower likelihood of lesbian and bisexual females with eating disorders getting diagnosed and accessing treatment. Theories About Mechanisms of Eating Disorders in LGB People Some of the disparities among prevalence rates between LGB people and their heterosexual peers may be explained by the minority stress model. People of marginalized groups frequently face victimization, discrimination, and adversity arising from their stigmatized identities. They also may receive less social support from family. These stressors can lead to increased risk for a number of health and mental health problems. In terms of eating disorders, people who identify as LGB may attempt to manage stress and distress through behaviors such as dieting or bingeing, which are in turn common symptoms of eating disorders. Further theories posit that gay culture and the gay community place a heightened focus on physical appearance, putting pressures and demands on gay men that are similar to those felt by heterosexual women. Applying this same lens to lesbian and bisexual women, it has been proposed they may be less prone to eating disorders because they do not share the standards of feminine beauty and pressures placed on heterosexual women by Western culture. While provocative, these theories about the role of physical appearance have not been tested and there is a profound risk in reducing eating disorders in a large group of diverse people to a single mechanism. There is much more to eating disorders than body image. Eating disorders are caused by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Body Image and Eating Disorders Treatment of LGB People With Eating Disorders There are no treatments specifically for LGB people with eating disorders. Treatments developed for heterosexual patients may be effective when applied with cultural sensitivity. It is important for providers to attend to issues about sexual identity. Therapists can help patients to address internalized homophobia and coming out and to work on self-acceptance and increasing self-esteem. Because LGB people may lack social support, increasing it can also be an important focus of treatment. Unfortunately, LGB people can face increased barriers to treatment. Almost all of the materials about eating disorders are written for cisgender heterosexual women so diverse people may not feel welcome at eating disorder treatment facilities. LGB people may face a lack of culturally competent providers who have both eating disorder expertise and sensitivity to the complexity of their sexual identity. Or they may feel uncomfortable talking about their experiences in treatment environments where the majority of people are heterosexual. They may need extra support and connection with other LGB people. When that cannot be found within their treatment environment, they may find it in support communities online. The 9 Best Online Therapy Programs